Agents that handle your operation’s volume and learn from every decision your team makes
Your current processes gain agents that carry out repetitive work inside your systems, while exceptions reach whoever decides. Every decision becomes a rule for the next case. This page shows the path, step by step.
A workflow is simply the path a piece of work travels.
Take the order → check stock → approve → invoice → deliver.
The problem
Many business processes rely on people switching between systems, looking up information, hunting for rules and repeating tasks.
The opportunity
Analyze that process, identify its decisions and tasks, connect the systems involved and determine where people, automation and agents can work together.
Example: “I want to cancel my order.”
The same customer request, travelling two different paths.
Before · the employee
identifies the customer;
finds the order;
checks its status;
checks the policy;
checks the payment;
requests approval;
cancels it;
calculates the refund;
logs it;
replies.
After · the agent
understands the request;
identifies customer and order;
queries the systems;
checks the rules;
decides within its limits;
executes;
confirms;
logs it;
replies.
The AI agent operates within the existing process, following the company’s rules.
A chatbot explains how to cancel. An agent cancels
Five different things that often get confused — and that only produce results when they work together.
Chatbot
It is the interface: where the conversation happens.
Workflow
It is the process: the path the work travels.
Agent
It is the ability to execute inside that process.
AI Harness
It is the structure that makes safe execution possible.
Outcome
It is the outcome: the only thing the business measures — and the only reason for everything before it.
Semantix AI Suite
Our platform for putting AI agents into production
One product connects the agents to the company’s systems, another coordinates the work between them and a third records every decision, so it can be explained. The fourth modernizes legacy systems, so they can also work with the agents.
Complex processes involve different departments, systems and decisions. A mesh of agents lets specialized agents work together — with people still in control.
One request travelling the mesh, step by step
A request comes in — “I want to cancel my order”
Customer Agentworks out who is asking and for what
Order Agentlocates and assesses the order
Orchestration
Distributes the work, keeps context across agents and decides when to bring in a person.
Fraud Agentchecks risk and exceptions
Finance Agentcalculates and logs the refund
ERP · CRM · TMS · WMS · APIs — the systems remain the source of truth
People set the limits, approve exceptions and answer for the operation
Execution log
·Request received: “I want to cancel order 84,213”.
·Customer Agent identifies the customer and their history.
·Order Agent locates the order and checks the delivery status.
·Fraud Agent assesses risk and looks for policy exceptions.
·Finance Agent calculates the refund within the rules.
·Orchestration executes the action in the ERP and updates the CRM.
·Action logged. The exception found goes to a human for approval.
Agents work together. Systems still matter. People stay in control.
We call this architecture an — and the component that orchestrates it, Agentix.
Business workflowthe process still exists — the agent operates inside it
Outcomeverified, logged and measurable
See the limit at work
Two requests reach the same agent. One is within the limits the company set; the other is not.
Executed
Amount within the policy limit · refund calculated · action logged with the agent’s identity, the rule applied and the timestamp. No person had to step in.
Blocked — awaiting approval
Amount above the limit authorized for automatic execution. The agent prepared everything — customer, order, rule and calculation — and sent it for human approval. The attempt is logged even though it was never executed.
What that structure is made of
Eight questions every agent must be able to answer before it acts.
Context
What the agent needs to know about the situation and the business.
Rules
The policies it must always follow.
Tools
Which systems it may use — and how.
Permissions
Which actions it may perform and which require approval.
Knowledge
The company information it has access to.
Monitoring
The record of every agent action.
Evaluation
The check that it did what it was supposed to do.
Governance
Who sets the limits, reviews them and answers for the operation.
Autonomy is introduced gradually
Autonomy does not mean the absence of people: people stop performing repetitive tasks and focus their attention where human judgment, relationships and accountability matter most. Each process enters at the level its risk allows and moves up as trust is confirmed in practice.
Level 1
It suggests
The agent prepares the answer and a person decides. Good for starting out and comparing.
Level 2
It executes with approval
It does everything, but only completes after a logged human “yes”.
Level 3
It executes within a limit
It handles the common cases on its own; above the threshold or outside the rule, it calls a person.
Level 4
It executes and self-corrects
It operates and tunes its own performance, under continuous supervision and audit.
The five questions a committee always asks
If the company has no answer to them, the project should not go to production — and we answer them together with the client before starting.
01
Who is accountable if the system gets it wrong?
Every action has a named human owner, a department and an authority level.
02
What gets logged?
The request, the data queried, the rule applied, the decision, the execution and the timestamp.
03
How is an action undone?
Before automating, we define the way back and who can trigger it.
04
What data can it see?
The minimum access required, with sensitive data protected or masked.
05
How do we know it is still working well?
Continuous evaluation of quality and drift, with an alert when behavior changes.
The tool that watches and evaluates
Safetix
Beyond setting each agent’s limits, it is necessary to continuously verify that it acts within them and to demonstrate this in audits. That is the role of Safetix.
Evaluate the quality of the answers and the decisions, not just whether the system replied.
Detect behavioral drift over time, before it becomes an incident.
Log every action in auditable form: who asked, which rule applied, what was executed.
Block anything outside the limits and route it for human approval.
Safetix is part of the Semantix AI Suite and is what makes autonomy defensible before auditors and regulators.
We do not start with the most complex process, nor the best-looking one to demo. We start with the one that meets these five conditions.
It happens often
If it occurs dozens of times a day, every minute saved multiplies.
It follows rules that exist
When the rule is not documented, the first step is to formalize it, before any automation.
The data is available
An agent only decides well with information the company can already provide.
Mistakes do no serious harm
We start where a mistake is reversible and cheap. Trust grows with the results.
And the fifth: someone in the business has to care about this process. Without an owner invested in the outcome, no technology sustains the change.
Agentix Journey method
Not everything should become an agent. The method shows what is worth it
Each task in the process gets two scores: volume (how often it happens and how repetitive it is) and complexity (how much judgment it requires). Crossing the two shows how much of the task can be handed to an agent.
Volume ↑ high
Q1
Fully automate
Very frequent with a clear rule: the agent runs it from start to finish.
E.g.: request triage, password reset.
Q2
Automate with approval
Very frequent but requires judgment: the agent prepares and a person approves.
E.g.: billing disputes, opinions with exceptions.
Q3
Simple automation
Infrequent with a clear rule: a simple agent handles it, with no orchestration.
E.g.: monthly report, status check.
Q4
AI supports the expert
Infrequent and requiring a lot of judgment: the person decides, AI helps them decide better.
E.g.: diagnosing a critical incident.
Complexity high →
Risk defines the controls, not the autonomy
After the quadrant, each task gets a risk score: what happens if it is done wrong? The higher the risk, the more controls are applied to the agent.
Low risk 1 to 3
Personal data protection and a record of every execution.
Medium risk 4 to 7
Full protections and human review by sampling.
High risk 8 to 10
Sector policies, mandatory human approval and a complete audit trail.
At the end of the method, the company has
A map of the process tasks, with the volume, cost, risk and quadrant of each one.
The specification of each agent: goal, inputs, outputs, systems, protections and acceptance test.
The return study: current cost, AI cost and expected gain.
The rollout order: what goes into the pilot, what waits and what should not become an agent.
Signs you need this
01
“The chatbot explains the process, but a person still has to carry it out.”
02
“Repetitive tasks eat up the hours of people who should be making decisions.”
03
“Each department tests AI on its own, with no standard or control.”
04
“AI pilots work, but never reach day-to-day operations.”
What we offer
From the first automation to operations run with agents, always inside the company’s process.
Processes redesigned for agents
We map the process end to end and decide where AI acts and where a person decides.
Also known as: End-to-end agentified processes
Agents in production
Agents that query systems, apply rules and carry out tasks, with a record of every action.
Also known as: Agentix · Agentic Mesh
Assistants for business teams
The first step: an assistant that answers the team’s questions using company information.
Also known as: Chatbot for business teams
Agents in the ERP
Business teams building their own agents on top of SAP, safely.
Also known as: SAP Business AI
By the numbers
500+
AI agents managed by Semantix
Source: Semantix, 2026
5,000+
orchestrated processes
Source: Semantix, 2026
60B+
managed transactions
Source: Semantix, 2026
95%
of organizations face integration challenges when taking AI into operations
Source: Connectivity Benchmark 2026
61%
of companies do not yet report any impact of AI on operating results
Source: HBR Analytic Services
The technologies we build agents with
The intelligence comes from market models and platforms; what is ours is the architecture that puts them to work inside each client’s processes, rules and systems.
Agentix
Safetix
LinkAPI
AWS
Microsoft Azure
Google Cloud
Databricks
Elastic
Redis
Technologies in the Semantix ecosystem. Display of partner trademarks is subject to their authorization.
Cases
Results from real projects
Clients are not named, for confidentiality.
Energy and utilitiesAI agents
AI agents that recover tax credits
Challenge
More than 112,000 entries per quarter and extensive tax law, all reviewed by hand.
What we did
An orchestrator agent and nine agents specialized by type of service, identifying PIS and COFINS tax credits.
90%precision in identifying credits
+R$ 20Min credits identified per month
Measured result
Cross-sectorAI agents
Procurement assistant integrated with SAP Ariba
Challenge
The procurement team handling first-level support, and duplicate entries caused by human error.
What we did
A virtual assistant that answers questions and checks order status in SAP and Ariba, 24/7.
51%of requests handled by the assistant
~R$ 5Mper half-year in freed-up capacity
Expected result · Projected savingsSAP Ariba
See all cases →Como fazemos isso? Ver a arquitetura →Ocultar a arquitetura técnica
Technical detail
Process discovery and decision mapping → a catalog of tools exposed to the agent (APIs, connectors, legacy RPA) → rules engine and authorization policies → multi-agent orchestration with execution state and memory → human-in-the-loop at approval points → per-action audit trail → continuous evaluation of quality and drift.
Components of the Semantix AI Suite: Agentix (orchestration), Safetix (governance and evaluation), LinkAPI (integration with enterprise systems).
Frequently asked questions
Common questions about AI agents
What is an enterprise AI agent?+
It is software that carries out steps of a business process — reading documents, querying systems, deciding within rules and recording the result — with a person reviewing whatever requires judgment. Unlike a chatbot, it does more than answer: it does the work inside the company’s systems.
How is an AI agent different from RPA?+
RPA repeats fixed clicks and stops when a screen or document changes. An agent understands content, handles variation and knows when to ask a person for help. The two coexist: RPA stays useful for stable tasks, and agents take over where interpretation is needed.
How do we make sure AI only does what is allowed?+
By setting limits before switching it on: what the agent does alone, what needs approval and what is off-limits. Every action is traced and sensitive data passes through filters. That is the role of Safetix, Semantix’s governance layer.
Where do we start, and when will we see results?+
With the highest-volume, lowest-complexity process, measuring a baseline before the change. A first agent in production is typically validated in about 90 days, with the success metric defined from the start.
This service is part of a single operating model, with AI agents and specialists on the Semantix AI Suite. Decisions made here feed your company’s shared context and make the other operations smarter.